What Is HR 899? Exploring The Bill To Abolish The Department Of Education And Its Tax Provisions
Have you ever wondered about the inner workings of government, particularly when it comes to legislative proposals that could really change things? There are, you know, these bills in the United States Congress that often get a number assigned to them, and sometimes they propose quite significant alterations to how our country operates. One such bill that has been discussed and reintroduced is known as HR 899, and it has, in a way, two distinct facets that people often talk about, both involving some pretty big ideas for change.
This particular bill, HR 899, has been, actually, a topic of conversation for a bit, with different versions appearing over time. It’s interesting how a single number can represent something so impactful, isn't it? We're going to, perhaps, look closely at what this bill is all about, according to the information that's been shared. It touches on, rather significantly, the future of education oversight and, in a completely separate but equally important context, some proposed changes to tax rules.
Understanding these legislative pieces is, in some respects, pretty important for anyone interested in public policy or even just how their government functions. So, let's take a closer look at HR 899, examining its main goals and what it might mean if it were to, eventually, become law. It's quite a fascinating topic, really, when you start to unpack it.
Table of Contents
- What is HR 899? The Education Bill
- Section 899: A Different Kind of Provision
- Frequently Asked Questions About HR 899
What is HR 899? The Education Bill
HR 899 is, you know, a bill in the United States Congress that has been introduced by Republican lawmakers. Its primary purpose, as described, is to formally dismantle the Department of Education. This is, actually, a pretty straightforward idea, at least in its core statement. The bill aims to terminate this federal department on a specific date, December 31, 2026, which is a rather clear deadline it sets out.
This particular version of HR 899, which was reintroduced on a Friday, and also mentioned as being introduced in the House of Representatives on January 31, 2025, and February 5, 2021, is quite concise. It contains, rather remarkably, just a single sentence. That sentence, to be precise, states, “The Department of Education shall.” This brevity is, in a way, striking for a piece of legislation that could have such a big effect. It suggests a very direct and unambiguous goal, doesn't it?
Representative Thomas Massie has been, rather notably, the one to reintroduce this bill. He announced that he has reintroduced HR 899, which aims to terminate the Department of Education. This bill has also, rather interestingly, gathered quite a bit of support, with 35 cosponsors, all of whom are Republicans, in addition to its sponsor. So, it's not just a single idea floating around, but one with, rather clearly, some backing.
A Look at the Bill's Intent
The core intent of HR 899, the one focused on education, is, quite simply, to abolish the federal Department of Education. The bill's text, as noted, is very short, stating, “The Department of Education shall.” This implies, rather strongly, that the department would be abolished on December 31, 2026. It’s a very direct approach to changing a significant part of the federal government’s structure, isn't it?
This bill has been referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce, which is, rather fittingly, the committee that would handle matters related to education and labor. For a bill to become law, as you know, it must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form. Then, rather importantly, it needs to be signed by the President. So, there's a definite path it must take, and committees are, in a way, the first major hurdle.
There was, you know, an HR 899 (118th) that was a bill in the United States Congress, and also an HR 899 (115th) that was a bill in the United States Congress. This suggests that the idea of terminating the Department of Education has been, perhaps, a recurring theme in legislative discussions over several congressional sessions. It’s not, apparently, a brand-new concept, but one that has been brought up before, which is pretty interesting.
The Legislative Process for HR 899
As we've touched on, for HR 899, or any bill for that matter, to become law, it must go through a specific, rather detailed process. It needs to be passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and both chambers must agree on the exact same wording. This is, you know, a pretty crucial step, as even small differences can stop a bill in its tracks. After that, the President must sign it into law.
The bill was, rather specifically, introduced in the House of Representatives on January 31, 2025, and also on February 5, 2021, and February 9, 2023. These dates indicate that various versions or reintroductions of HR 899 have occurred across different congressional sessions. This shows, in a way, a consistent effort by some lawmakers to pursue this particular change to the federal government. It's a long game, sometimes, for legislative ideas.
You can, actually, read the full text of bills like HR 899 at congress.gov, which is a pretty good resource for legislative information. Bill summaries are, rather helpfully, authored by CRS (Congressional Research Service), which provides, you know, non-partisan analysis of legislative issues. This kind of information helps people get a better sense of what's being proposed, which is, rather important for public awareness.
Potential Impact of Abolishing the Department of Education
If the Department of Education were to, eventually, end, it would mean some pretty significant changes. One of the direct implications mentioned is the potential for saving taxpayers a considerable amount of money. The appropriated budget for the department this fiscal year was about $68.3 billion, which is, rather clearly, a large sum. So, ending the department could, rather directly, save that money for taxpayers, which is a point often made by proponents.
The question of "What would it mean if the education department ended?" is, rather naturally, a big one. While the text doesn't go into extensive detail about all the ripple effects, the financial aspect is highlighted as a primary consequence. It's about, in a way, shifting responsibilities and funding away from a federal agency, which could have a lot of different outcomes depending on how those functions are then handled, or if they are handled at all, by other entities.
This move would, in essence, remove a federal layer of oversight and funding from education. It suggests a belief that education matters should be handled differently, perhaps more locally or by states, without the federal department's involvement. This is, rather obviously, a philosophical point about the role of federal government in education, and it's a debate that has been, you know, going on for quite some time.
Section 899: A Different Kind of Provision
Now, it's important to note that the number "899" also appears in a completely different context within legislative discussions, specifically concerning tax provisions. This "Section 899" was, in a way, a tax code tucked into President Donald Trump’s budget bill. It's a bit confusing, perhaps, to have the same number refer to two such distinct things, but that's how it is sometimes with legislative numbering.
This Section 899 would have, rather significantly, raised taxes on the income earned from U.S. assets held by individuals or businesses. It was, you know, a proposed new tax provision that was originally included in the House budget reconciliation bill, which was HR 1. So, while HR 899 is about education, Section 899, as a tax concept, was part of a different, larger bill, which is a pretty important distinction to make.
This summary, in particular, focuses on practical issues under proposed Section 899. It was part of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), which included, rather sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades. This suggests that Section 899, in its tax form, was a pretty substantial proposal aimed at international tax policy, which is a very complex area, as you can imagine.
Tax Changes and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), which included the Section 899 tax provision, was, rather notably, a major piece of legislation. It aimed to bring about some of the most significant changes to how foreign capital is taxed in the U.S. in many years. This suggests a desire to, perhaps, reshape international tax relationships and how the U.S. interacts financially with other countries, which is a pretty big undertaking.
On May 22, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill with amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, including the addition of proposed Section 899. This section was titled “Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes.” This gives us, you know, a clearer picture of its purpose: to address what were perceived as unfair tax practices by other countries. It was, in a way, a retaliatory measure, or at least intended to be one.
The Senate Finance Committee’s version of HR 1 proposed, rather interestingly, key changes to Section 899’s "revenge tax" and BEAT (Base Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax). These changes included offering new exemptions, lower caps, and delayed compliance. This indicates that even within the legislative process, there was, rather clearly, a lot of discussion and modification around this tax provision, showing how complex tax law can be.
Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes
Proposed Section 899, which was introduced as part of the Defending American Jobs and Investment Act (HR 591) and incorporated into the House Ways and Means Committee's version of the bill, was, rather specifically, about retaliating against what were considered unfair foreign tax practices. It wasn't, you know, designed to go after governments directly for treating U.S. firms unfairly. Instead, it targeted people and businesses that had ties to "discriminatory foreign countries."
This approach is, in a way, pretty distinct. Rather than direct government-to-government action, Section 899 aimed to affect individuals and companies that were connected to countries deemed to have unfair tax systems. This means, rather clearly, that the impact would be felt by specific entities, which is a very precise way to try and exert pressure. It’s a rather interesting strategy, isn't it?
A new bill in Congress would, rather directly, do just that: retaliate against unfair foreign taxes. Some bills can be, you know, hundreds of pages long, but the core idea here was about a targeted tax measure. This highlights how specific and detailed tax legislation can get, even when addressing broad international economic issues. It's about, you know, trying to level the playing field, in some respects.
Discretion and Executive Power
The new provision, Section 899, also, rather significantly, expands executive taxing power. It grants extensive discretion to the Treasury Secretary in determining what constitutes an "unfair foreign tax." This means, rather clearly, that the Secretary would have a lot of authority to make decisions about which countries or tax practices fall under this definition, which is a pretty big responsibility.
On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee released draft legislative text for inclusion in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (HR 1), modifying various tax provisions of the version of the bill. This continued refinement shows, you know, that the details of Section 899 were still being worked out and debated, even as it moved through the legislative process. It's a testament to how complex these tax changes can be, with many moving parts.
This broad discretion given to the Treasury Secretary is, in a way, a key aspect of Section 899. It means that the enforcement of these remedies against unfair foreign taxes would, rather heavily, rely on the judgment and decisions made by the executive branch. This is, perhaps, a point of discussion for those concerned about the balance of power between legislative and executive branches, as it gives the executive a lot of room to act.
Frequently Asked Questions About HR 899
People often have questions about bills like HR 899, and that's pretty understandable. Here are some common inquiries:
What would it mean if the education department ended?
If the Department of Education were to end, as proposed by HR 899, it would mean, rather directly, the termination of this federal agency. One specific implication mentioned is a potential saving for taxpayers of about $68.3 billion, which was the department's appropriated budget for a recent fiscal year. This would, you know, shift the responsibility for educational matters away from the federal level, potentially to states or other entities.
Who introduced HR 899?
Representative Thomas Massie has, rather consistently, reintroduced HR 899, the bill to terminate the Department of Education. He announced that he has reintroduced this bill, which is, rather notably, one sentence long. This particular bill has also gathered support from 35 cosponsors, all of whom are Republicans, in addition to its sponsor, which shows, rather clearly, some backing for the proposal.
Is HR 899 a tax bill or an education bill?
This is, actually, a pretty common source of confusion because the number "899" appears in two distinct legislative contexts. HR 899, as a standalone bill, is an education bill specifically aimed at terminating the Department of Education. However, "Section 899" refers to a tax provision that was part of a different, larger bill (like HR 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"), which focused on changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital and addressing unfair foreign taxes. So, it's both, but in different legislative packages, which is important to keep in mind.
You can find answers to most of the questions about bills like HR 899 on resources like GovTrack.us, including on their overview and details sections. It’s a pretty good place to, you know, explore legislative information.
Learn more about legislation on our site, and link to this page for more details on government bills.
What is Human Resource Management and Why it is Important?
HR Generalist Course - Protouch
What Does HR Do? 5 Frequently Asked Questions about HR - AIHR
